Cases 31 - 40 of 699
Almond v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv23671
Plaintiff:
Anwar Almond
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIYA CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NADINE MOONEY, JENNIFER S. JOHNSON, a/k/a Jennifer Peach and others
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-1977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIYA CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Porcenat v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 6:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
Rose Porcenat
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Remona Charles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REMONA L. CHARLES
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-466-D-RN
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
