Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Keaton et al v. Tall Oaks Realty, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02649
Plaintiff:
Deborah Keaton and Fair Housing Advocates Association
Defendant:
Tall Oaks Realty, LLC, Daniel Pessar and Taffy Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mark Keaton v. Dave Hannum, et al
as 15-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK KEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE HANNUM, LESLIE SLONE, CHRISTINE ZOOK and others
James Phillips v. Joseph E. Ternes, Jr., et al
as 14-6190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CHARLES R. MCCOLLOM, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH E. TERNES, JR., in his individual and official capacity, MARGARET KEATON, CHARLES ABBOTT and others
Epps v. Marion County et al
as 6:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Dusty Keaton Epps
Defendant:
Marion County and Cliff Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Obey v. Frisco Medical Center L.L.P. et al
as 4:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Renee Obey
Defendant:
Frisco Medical Center L.L.P., James Laferney, William Keaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AL-MOHAMMEDI v. VANYO et al
as 1:2013cv01037
Plaintiff:
JASSIM AL-MOHAMMEDI
Defendant:
ANN VANYO, HIBA KHALIL, JAY REUTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Mohammedi -V- The City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2013cv01020
Plaintiff:
Jassim Al-Mohammedi
Defendant:
The City of Buffalo, P.O. Ann Vanyo, P.O. Hiba Khalil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Prince v. Cha, et al
as 13-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. CHA, Individually & Official Capacities, DR. KEATON, Individually & Official Capacities and L.N.P. SHORTUCKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
