Cases 41 - 50 of 86
James Horton v. Frank Pobjecky, et al
as 17-1757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HORTON, as the Independent Administrator of the Estate of Michael DeAngelo Sago, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK POBJECKY, GARY CARUANA and WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DeAngelo v. Veach et al
as 1:2017cv02571
Plaintiff:
Matthew DeAngelo
Defendant:
Daniel Veach , Joseph Albandia , Village of Rosemont and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Grissett v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2016cv02814
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Grissett
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftis et al v. Ramos et al
as 3:2016cv02300
Plaintiff:
Marissa Loftis and Marquise Deangelo Loftis Jr.
Defendant:
Denise Ramos, J. Wilborn and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marcus Blanton v. Thomas Brown, et al
as 16-15672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DEANGELO BLANTON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BROWN, Former Sheriff of Dekalb County, in his individual and official capacity, JEFFERY MANN, Sheriff of Dekalb County, in his individual and official capacity, STANCI CLAYTON, former Detention Officer of Dekalb County Sheriff's Office, in his individual and official capacity and others
EMMI v. DEANGELO et al
as 2:2016cv03774
Plaintiff:
JOHN EMMI
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEANGELO , KING and FRANK NOONAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Robertson County Board of Education
as 3:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Jones
Defendant:
Robertson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
