Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv06081
Plaintiff: SONYA E. GONZALEZ
Defendant: CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEARY v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04514
Plaintiff: ANGEL M. LEARY
Defendant: PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAPP v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04267
Plaintiff: JASON SAPP
Defendant: PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahoe v. IRS et al
as 3:2011cv01235
Plaintiff: Kevin Douglas Donahoe
Defendant: IRS, Treasury, Irma E. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01570
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryan Hole, et al v. Texas A & M University, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-40311
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRYAN G. HOLE and ERIC E. GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY, ROBERT GATES, DAVID PARROT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hearns v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv01393
Plaintiff: Bobby Hearns and Bobby Hearns
Defendant: City of Chicago, Illinois, J. F. Sikorski and E. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?