Cases 41 - 50 of 552
Khali Bey v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALI MALIK BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DCFS, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
AWAH v. LVNV FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02612
Plaintiff:
EDMUND AWAH
Defendant:
LVNV FUNDING LLC, PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, CBNA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Khali Malik Bey v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2021cv07878
Plaintiff:
Khali Malik Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, DCFS, Dept. of Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2021cv07361
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, Lawrence E Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jesus Gomez et al v. Warrent Stanley et al
as 2:2021cv07546
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez, Edmund Zorrilla, Giovanni Bembi and others
Defendant:
Warren Stanley, Daniel Minor, Christopher Margaris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eva Rodriguez v. Edmund D. Edelman et al
as 5:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Eva Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edmund D. Edelman, Does 1-50, LA County Superior Court of California Stanley Mosk Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANTOJA et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2021cv02197
Plaintiff:
SITO PANTOJA, MARIA TUSA, EDMUND A WALSH and others
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ, DORA CERVANTES, GARY R. ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
