Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Caldwell v. Snyder et al
as 4:2010cv02041
Defendant:
Vic Snyder, Stark Ligon, Emmanuel Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King's Ranch of Jonesboro Incorporated v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
as 3:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
King's Ranch of Jonesboro Incorporated
Defendant:
Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Garland County Department of Human Services
as 6:2009cv06096
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward King
Defendant:
Garland County Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2022 Food Stamp Program: Review of Admin. Decision
King v. Department of Army
as 6:2009cv06095
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward King
Defendant:
United States Army, The
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rogers v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Arnice Rogers and Arnice Rogers
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ed Adams, Cleon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hankins et al v. Selig et al
as 4:2009cv00323
Defendant:
John Selig, Phil Smith, Kevin King and others
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Hankins and Janet E Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. Haas et al
as 5:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique King
Defendant:
Dale Haas, Craighead County, Arkansas, Steve Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
