Cases 41 - 50 of 891
MUHAMMAD v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv23304
Plaintiff:
LIVING TRUST OF LUKUNDA MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. SHELTON, JAMES T. CALLAHAN, EDWARD J. CURLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AKRAM v. AKRAM et al
as 2:2023cv23147
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD IMRAN AKRAM
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD SHAHID AKRAM, MUHAMMAD SHAHID HAYAT, SHOIB SAJJAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Muhammad v. Ashford at Stoneridge Apts. LP
as 1:2023cv05696
Plaintiff:
Taliah Muhammad
Defendant:
Ashford at Stoneridge Apts. LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Scott v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Officer Jabril Muhammad, Sergeant Ricciardi and Borough of Colwyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felicia Muhammad v. Alberto M. Carvalho et al
as 2:2023cv10232
Plaintiff:
Felicia Muhammad
Defendant:
Alberto M. Carvalho, Ileana Davalos, George McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bilal Muhammad v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09846
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
