Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Alfred Thomas v. Christy Mann
as 09-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, MECKLENBURG COUNTY GENERAL DISTRICT & CIRCUIT COURTS, MCDOWELL STREET CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-6364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. Mann et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Alfred T. Thomas
Defendant:
Christy T. Mann, Mecklenburg County Courts, McDowell Street Center for Family Law, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hendrick et al
as 4:2008cv00474
Plaintiff:
Micheal T Thomas and Micheal T Thomas
Defendant:
Howard H Hendrick, Richard L DeVaughn, Ronald L Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alfred Thomas v. US
as 08-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GILCREST, NATHANIEL P. PROCTOR and others
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alfred T. Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Peter Gilcrest, Nathaniel P. Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Austin et al v. Wilkinson et al
as 4:2001cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Austin , Michael Benge , Alonzo L. Bonner and others
Defendant:
Reginald Wilkinson , Stephen J Huffman , Bernard J. Ryznar and others
Interested_party:
Anthony M. Hoepf, Raymond Mefford, Derrick Scott Newmann and others
Movant:
Dave Easley, Eugene Groves, James T. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
