Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Toyukuk et al v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mike Toyukuk , Fred Augustine , Native Village of Hooper Bay and others
Defendant:
Mead Treadwell , Gail Fenumiai , Michelle Speegle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Smith v. Batts et al
as 2:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Alan H. Smith
Defendant:
Allen Batts, Olin Lynch, Steve Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hicks
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Sonia Arvanitis, Edward Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Epperly v. Obama et al
as 1:2012cv00011
Petitioner:
Gordon Warren Epperly
Respondent:
Barack Hussein Obama, II , Nancy Pelosi , Mead Treadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kennedy et al v. Elyea et al
as 2:2012cv02155
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis and Louis Schicker
Plaintiff:
Andre Kennedy , Timothy Giancana , Paul McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuelsen et al v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
H. Robin Samuelsen, Jr. , Russell S. Nelson , Vicki Otte and others
Defendant:
Mead Treadwell and Gail Fenumiai
Amicu:
Alaska Redistricting Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mason v. Treadwell Restaurants of AL, LLC
as 5:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
James Mason
Defendant:
Treadwell Restaurants of AL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robert Heard v. B. Edenfield, et al
as 11-15059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant - Appellee:
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, C. R. SMITH, MARC T. TREADWELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
