Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Devin M Harmon v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2015cv00137
Defendant:
City of Glendale, Jane Doe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Devin M Harmon
Jeanne Mondongo Manunga v. Joe Doe Gutierez et al
as 2:2014cv09094
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Joe Doe, Joe Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Mondongo Manunga
Jeanne Mondongo Manunga v. Hernandez et al.
as 8:2014cv01872
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Gravy and Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Mondongo Manunga
Rossi v. Garrison et al
as 1:2014cv01642
Defendant:
Nancie Jo Bowers, Dennis Burge, Stephen D. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
James Harold Rossi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bensam v. Bharara
as 14-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benula Bensam
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Jane Does No. 1, 2, Individually and Officially and United States Marshals Service, Joe Does No 1, 2, 3, Individually and Officially
Defendant - Appellee:
Preetinder S. Bharara, Individually and Officially, Reed Michael Brodsky, Individually and Officially, Richard Tarlowe, Individually and Officially and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeanne Mondongo Manunga v. Hernandez et al
as 8:2014cv00713
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Grevy and Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Mundongo Manunga
Barroso, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.
as 5:2014cv00421
Defendant:
All Counties in the State of Texas, Sheriff of Bexar County, Texas, Sheriffs (or similar officials) of All Counties in the State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Barroso, Twelve Jay Does, Twelve Jeff Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Collins v. Will County et al
as 1:2014cv00902
Plaintiff:
Danny Collins
Defendant:
County of Will, Paul Kaupas and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
