Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Francisco Pena v. Texas Medical Board, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-40451
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANCISCO I. PENA, M.A. M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, ROBERTA M. KALAFUT, D.O., Former President, Texas Medical Board, KEITH MILLER, Former Member, Texas Medical Board and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv04469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04468
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robinson v. Bronx Court Clinic
as 15-2604
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tiffany M. Robinson
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Kerner, M.D., Bronx Court Clinic - Bronx Supreme Court, Bronx Supreme Court, Criminal Division, Wen Gu, M.A. and others
Scott Dean v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., et al
as 15-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant: SCOTT D. DEAN
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and M.A. PATRICK, aka Rita Patrick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00595
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09233
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones-Huff v. The City of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv09577
Plaintiff: Hazel Jones-Huff
Defendant: The City of Chicago, Courtney Hill, Terrance A. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv00266
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?