Cases 51 - 60 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00978
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HOYOS, v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2017cv10542
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , ALFARO ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARLEN HOYOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01382
Plaintiff:
Leslie Reed and Otis McGinnis
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections, Jay Russell, Donna Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tia v. Honolulu Police Department (HPD) et al
as 1:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Honolulu Police Department (HPD), De Caires, Walmart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2017cv12261
Plaintiff:
Hopkins T. Charles
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Dept of Corrections, Paul Klee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Sweitzer v. McGuinn et al
as 1:2017cv01741
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Sweitzer
Defendant:
Colleen McGuinn, Dario J. Broccolino, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weberg et al v. Michigan Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv12027
Plaintiff:
Merrianne Weberg and Douglas Weberg
Defendant:
Michigan Dept of Corrections , Macomb Correctional Facility , Randall Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
