Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Hensley v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01245
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Department of Children and Families
Plaintiff:
John Edward Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altavilla v. Larksville Boro Police et al
as 3:2018cv01326
Defendant:
Larksville Boro Police, Patrolman Josh Evans, Patrolman Matt Stitzer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert John Altavilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIRELA v. ROS-LEHTINEN et al
as 1:2018cv00295
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PIRELA
Defendant:
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, ALOYMA SANCHEZ, CARLOS ALVAREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Edwards v. Joshua Mills, et al
as 17-35455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA MILLS and VINTON HOWELL
Medved v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Birkeland v. Jorgenson et al
as 0:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Dean Birkeland
Defendant:
John Edward Jorgenson , Kyle Eckert , Joseph Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirela v. Unknown Bar of Homosexuals and False Witnesses Used et al
as 1:2017cv21311
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Unknown Bar of Homosexuals and False Witnesses Used, Thomas Williams, John Edward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirela v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2017cv21125
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Edwards
Defendant:
Joshua Mills and Vinton Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2016cv03144
Plaintiff:
K.G. Smith
Defendant:
City Of Houston , John Edward Obenhaus , CIMM'S Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
