Cases 51 - 60 of 214
Richardson (El Bey) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Defendant:
Fayette County, Amy P. Wierch, TN Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Erique Jermaine Richardson (El Bey)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Flanagan et al
as 3:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Sergeant Chism, City of Jackson, Officer Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. The City of Jackson Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Chief James Davis, John Doe Company 1-5, John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Almeia Bolden, Tammy Heard, Keith Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. City of Jackson
as 3:2020cv00719
Plaintiff:
William Noel, Helen Noel and Clifton Jackson
Defendant:
City of Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. City of Jackson, Mississipi
as 3:2020cv00533
Plaintiff:
Donovan Evans
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississipi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bormuth v. City of Jackson et al
as 2:2020cv11923
Defendant:
Arlene Robinson, in her official capacity as City Council member, Laura Schlecte, in her official capacity as City Council member, City of Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Bormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Slone v. Harbor Loans of Clinton, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Jane Doe, AAG, Zack Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Slone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modacure v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
Devon Modacure
Defendant:
James E. Davis, Kenneth Short, II, Cobey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
