Cases 61 - 70 of 452
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS V THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
as 2:2022cv10296
Defendant:
SHAMILYA WILLIAMS, University of Michigan, University of Michigan Work Connections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jermaine Capel v. Norfolk Police Department
as 22-1109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE M. CAPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORFOLK SHERIFF'S, OFFICER L. MELLINGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pr Diversity-Petition for Removal
Zawacky et al v. County of Clark et al
as 3:2022cv05101
Plaintiff:
Susan Zawacky, Alexzandra Gasaway, Tiffany Wallaway and others
Defendant:
County of Clark, Chuck Atkins, Sean Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Crane v. Cornish et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daphne Crane
Defendant:
Rita Cornish, Troy Rawlins, Julie Geroge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
