Cases 61 - 70 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv16153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv14827
Defendant:
ERICA CHMIELEWSKI, LORI M. TIRRI, WILLIAM WOODWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. BURKE et al
as 3:2018cv13041
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Richard Burke, The Warren County Prosecutor's Office, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Carrol County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2018cv03069
Plaintiff:
Brennan Bradley
Defendant:
Carrol County, Arkansas, Robert Grudek, Donald E. Harlan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALLAHAM v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv04788
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. CALLAHAM
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY, JAMES TEDESCO, III, BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pantastico v. Department of Education, State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Chardonnay Pantastico
Defendant:
Department of Education, State of Hawaii, Kathryn Matayoshi, Naomi Takamori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv05189
Plaintiff:
THEO SMITH
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. SCHUCK et al
as 2:2017cv05190
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS TINSLEY
Defendant:
JAMES F. SCHUCK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JANE/JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copes v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv08413
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Copes
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Gina Mestre, Timothy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Badley v. Carroll County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2017cv03068
Plaintiff:
Brennan Badley
Defendant:
Carroll County, Arkansas, Robert Grudek, Donald E. Harlan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
