Cases 61 - 70 of 1,097
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CRAMPTON v. MCDERMOTT et al
as 2:2023cv03430
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CRAMPTON
Defendant:
CHIEF BRIAN MCDERMOTT, CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. City of New York
as 23-777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Noheme Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Yvonne Edwards, individually and Geoffrey Wyrick, individually
Defendant:
John or Jane Does 1-10, individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 1:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
