Cases 61 - 70 of 268
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018cv02035
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Brent Cardall, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018at01231
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Defendant:
Brent Cardall, County of Yolo, Yolo County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Straughter et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2018cv03651
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department, Allen Nance and others
Plaintiff:
Tureko Straughter and K. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlon Campbell v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 18-55278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and CALVIN REMINGTON, individually and as Interim Chief Probation Officer for the Los Angeles County Probation Department
Lindon v. Saffold et al
as 1:2018cv00442
Defendant:
Shirley Strickland Saffold, Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program, Inc., ORCA House and others
Plaintiff:
James Lindon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018at00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
WINDHAM v. BUTLER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
TYWANN R. WINDHAM
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Frank Dortch v. York County Children and Youth, et al
as 17-3793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK JERRID DORTCH
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES, PAUL THORNE, IRENE FRANZIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
