Cases 61 - 70 of 259
WOODEN v. ROWLANDS et al
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
SADIE DARNELL, CLOVIS WATSON, JR and MICHAEL ROWLANDS
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WOODEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatlin et al v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Ryan Lee, Jeffery Collins, Francisco Llanes and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Gatlin, Clarissa Simms and Edison Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Southwestern Correctional LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Southwestern Correctional, LLC doing business as LaSalle Corrections LLC doing business as LaSalle Southwest Corrections, Stacey King, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. The Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry
as 2:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
Sean Rowland
Defendant:
The Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 3:2020cv04160
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, Deborah A. Cooksey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. Southwestern Correctional LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01590
Defendant:
Southwestern Correctional LLC, Stacey King, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alan Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
