Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 105
SMITH v. PEOPLES GASS CORPRACTION
as 2:2016cv01278
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: PEOPLES GASS CORPRACTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GENERAL DOLLAR STOR OWNER'S
as 2:2016cv01274
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: GENERAL DOLLAR STOR OWNER'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MONEY GRAM
as 2:2016cv01271
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: MONEY GRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA PROBACTION AND PROLE DEAPARTEMENT
as 2:2016cv01277
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA PROBACTION AND PROLE DEAPARTEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMININSTRACTION
as 2:2016cv01276
Plaintiff: DEWIT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMININSTRACTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KLEENEX CORPRACTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01270
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: KLEENEX CORPRACTION, KIMBERLY CLARK CORPACTION and CLARK GLOBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff: DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY COMMON PLESE COURT, PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FBI
as 3:2016cv00165
Plaintiff: THOMAS SMITH
Defendant: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C.R. et al v. City of Antioch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03742
Plaintiff: C.R. , I.R. , R.R. and others
Defendant: City of Antioch, Rick Smith, Chris Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Lorain County Board of Elections et al
as 1:2016cv01689
Plaintiff: Gerald W. Phillips
Defendant: Lorain County Board of Elections , Thomas Smith , Helen Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?