Cases 71 - 80 of 565
Lott v. Estes
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Jean Lott
Defendant:
Dee Dee Noel Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johanna Immelt v. Dee Sharp, et al
as 22-35249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHANNA M. IMMELT
Defendant / Appellee:
DEE SHARP, in her official capacity as Program Director and TAMBRA MCCOWAN, in her official capacity as Professional Licensing Manager
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING REAL ESTATE APPRAISER PROGRAM
Holte v. Moody et al
as 8:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ed Brosky, Wendy Makholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bongiovanni et al v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Brittany Bongiovanni, Jessica Caldwell, Erin Davis and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Karl Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasquez v. Baldock et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Carlos Velasquez
Defendant:
Robert Baldock, Dee Benson, Allison Eid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alfred v. Dee
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jaedan Alfred
Defendant:
Philbert Dee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gressett v. Roy et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Brianna J Gressett
Defendant:
Charles Roy, Daisy Alvardo, John Adoho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
