Cases 71 - 80 of 772
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1847
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15648
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Medina, et al v. McIff Allen, et al
as 23-4057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN HEPIKIYA MEDINA, JUSTIN HORTON, MADELAINE THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE ANNE MARIE MCIFF ALLEN, THE HONORABLE JEREMIAH HUMES, THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Hall v. Nassau County
as 23-685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne J. Hall, Reina Hernandez and Floridalma Portillo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Nassau and Department of Assessment of Nassau County
Defendant:
Does 1-25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
