Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Brodsky v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11545
Plaintiff: Jay Brodsky
Defendant: Doe Defendants and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv06503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv12147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01108
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15860
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01715
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Handy v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00608
Plaintiff: Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc., Travis Kalanick, Liane Hornsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv06124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brooklyn Center for Independence for the Disabled v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al.
as 1:2017cv06399
Plaintiff: Brooklyn Center for Independence for the Disabled , Taxis for All Campaign , Disabled In Action of Metropolitan New York and others
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Sarfraz Maredia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?