Cases 71 - 80 of 3,938
Marty Hierholzer v. Isabel Guzman
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
MARTY HIERHOLZER and MJL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
ISABEL GUZMAN, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Wesley Smith, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TIM KAINE, ROBERT A. DYBING and others
Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Texas Thomas Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemens v. Kids Above All
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Georgette Clemons and Georgette Clemens
Defendant:
Kids Above All, Virginia Towner, Precious Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Matthew Jones v. Virginia State Police
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE and NEWPORT NEWS POLICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
