Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,009
Stephen Lush v. Chris Nicholson, et al
as 23-2737
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant / Appellee: CHRIS M. NICHOLSON, NOAH D. TRIMMER, STEVE W. STEINER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv07692
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02798
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01572
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Reader v. Graham et al
as 5:2023cv01024
Plaintiff: Thomas Daugherty Reader
Defendant: Deputy Eric Graham, Deputy Jimmy Vasquez, Jr., Kerr County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff: Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant: City of St. Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lush, Stephen v. Nicholson, Chris et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff: Stephen Lush
Defendant: Chris M. Nicholson, Noah D. Trimmer, Steve W. Steiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birch v. New Milford
as 23-1153
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ralph Birch and Shawn Henning
Defendant: Andrew Ocif, Scott O'Mara, John Mucherino and others
Defendant / Appellant: Town of New Milford, Steven Jordan and Robert Santoro, as Administrator of the Estate of David Shortt
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?