Cases 81 - 90 of 280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
AMOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
MARCI JONES AMOS
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, MICHAEL MANGIONE, MARY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. McDonough
as 2:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
B. Angelica Wallace and Angelica B Wallace
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
DEMPS v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Andrea Demps
Defendant:
Dept of Veteran Affairs and DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Michael Hill v. Denis McDonough
as 23-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis McDonough, Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs
WHITE v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WHITE
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
