Cases 81 - 90 of 198
McCracken v. Aiken et al
as 3:2015cv00443
Defendant:
Chief Judge Ann Aiken, Deputy Barnum, Clackamas Co. Energy Assistance and others
Plaintiff:
Ellen Marguerite McCracken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv10010
Plaintiff:
Latoya Orr
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Eric Duval, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Kenney et al
as 4:2014cv03243
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Fred Britten, Does 1-8 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Franklin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brown v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv06483
Plaintiff:
Rasheedah Brown
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. John Froehlich, Ernst Jean Jabouin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Estrada et al
as 1:2014cv06459
Defendant:
John Does 1-8, Juan Estrada, Timothy Gunther and others
Plaintiff:
Davino Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05861
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1-8 and Steven Lopez
Plaintiff:
Samantha Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07721
Plaintiff:
Christina Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of New York, Dionis Bravo, David Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
