Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Barajas v. Saline County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Saline County, Arkansas, Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger, Christy Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Simpson et al
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Richard Sullivan
Defendant:
Kirk Simpson, Robert Crestman, Devon Stroud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Copeland v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Casey D Copeland
Defendant:
Marty Sullivan, Stasia McDonald and Stasia Burk McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Stevens et al
as 4:2019cv00618
Defendant:
Bradley Stevens, John Does, Nathan Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Clark Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palade et al v. Board of Trustees University of Arkansas System et al
as 4:2019cv00379
Defendant:
C C Gibson, Kelly Eichler, Steve Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Borse, J Thomas Sullivan and Philip Palade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rodgers v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rodgers
Defendant:
Taura McDaniel, Val Price, Ralph Wilson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. County of Benton, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05063
Plaintiff:
Adrian Michael Flores
Defendant:
County of Benton, Arkansas, Shawn Holloway, James Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
