Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEAVITT v. SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED
as 1:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM LEAVITT
Defendant:
SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED, d/b/a BAHA MAR CASINO, CHOW TAI FOOK ENTERPRISES LTD. and SKY WARRIOR BAHAMAS LIMITED doing business as BAHA MAR CASINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blunt Man Bob v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Blunt Man Bob and Paul Tay
Defendant:
Debra Campbell and David Zack
Interested Party:
City of Asheville, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hankins v. Swiskey et al
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Qiana Hankins
Defendant:
Helen Jacqueline Swiskey and J T Tai & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
