Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Santiago et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 1:2019cv11868
Defendant:
Misial Rodriguez, John Barbieri, Domenic J. Sarno and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 - 4 and Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Santiago v. City of Springfield et al
as 1:2019cv11869
Defendant:
Misial Rodriguez, John Barbieri, Domenic J. Sarno and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santiago v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2019cv11869
Defendant:
Misial Rodriguez, John Barbieri, Domenic J. Sarno and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DUBOSE et al v. ZANNI et al
as 1:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. DUBOSE and CHERYL DUBOSE
Defendant:
RICHARD ZANNI , ANGEL SANTIAGO, JOSEPH CAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almonte v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv11865
Plaintiff:
Sauel S. Almonte
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Douglas Varano, Nicholas D. Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Santiago v. Lawlor et al
as 3:2014cv00435
Defendant:
Joseph Lawlor , Ronald Mercado , Bradford Seely and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPPS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2011cv03929
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD EPPS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANGEL SANTIAGO and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padn-Rivera v. A S Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01345
Plaintiff:
Cindy Padn-Rivera
Defendant:
A S Medical, Inc. and Angel Santiago-Bernier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
