Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rawls v. Miami Dade County et al
as 1:2023cv20085
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rawls
Defendant:
Miami Dade County, Miami Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation, Anthony Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright Jr. v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05991
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright Jr.
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former Police Sgt. Ronald Watts, Former CPD Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05895
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter v. Wright et al
as 3:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Terrell Porter
Defendant:
Laurens County, Georgia, Sheriff Larry Dean and Deputy Sheriff Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS AUGUSTINE, DAVID BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
