Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anil Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv08715
Plaintiff:
CDSA Investments, Inc., a California Corporation, Anil Patel, Asha Patel and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 Inclusive, City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation and City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CDSA Investments, Inc., a California Corporation et al v. City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2020cv07881
Plaintiff:
CDSA Investments, Inc., a California Corporation and Anil Patel
Defendant:
Does 1-10 Inclusive and City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL et al v. LAKHANI et al
as 3:2018cv08839
Plaintiff:
ANIL PATEL and MANISH PATEL
Defendant:
NARENDRA LAKHANI, SONALI MODY, DARSHAN LAKHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PATEL et al v. COLE SCHOTZ, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv04868
Plaintiff:
ANIL PATEL and MANISH PATEL
Defendant:
COLE SCHOTZ, P.C., RABINOWITZ, LUBETKIN & TULLY, LLC, NARENDRA LAKHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
San Joaquin Motel and Hotel Pr, et al v. City of Stockton, et al
as 10-15235
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN MOTEL AND HOTEL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ARVIN PATEL, JAWAID AKHTAR and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAIR AFZL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, GARY PODESTO, STEVE PINKERTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
