Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Karen Arwood, et al v. Hamblen County Jail, et al
as 23-5883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN ARWOOD and RAYMOND ARWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMBLEN COUNTY JAIL, ESCO JARNAGIN, Sheriff, TERESA LAWS, Captain and others
Jackson v. Bing et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Eric Todd Jackson
Defendant:
Christy Arwood Bing, Edward E. DeWerff, John W. Carrey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arwood et al v. Hamblen County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Karen Arwood and Raymond Arwood
Defendant:
Hamblen County Jail, Esco Jarnagin, Teresa Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arwood et al v. Hamblen County Government et al (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Karen Arwood, Melissa Bellew, Bonnie Bullington and others
Defendant:
Hamblen County Government, Hamblen County Legislative Body and Howard Shipley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hatcher et al v. Genessee County et al
as 2:2018cv11986
Plaintiff:
Imani Hatcher , De'Angelo Lansdown , Elvin Coleman and others
Defendant:
Genessee County, Robert Pickell and Jason Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arwood v. UAB Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv01816
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arwood
Defendant:
UAB Hospital and Ocore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Schiller et al
as 2:2016cv12755
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Steven M Schiller and Steve Arwood
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carlson v. Schneider et al
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jay Carlson
Defendant:
Brenda Schneider, Jeffrey Suhanic, PNC Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
