Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brooks V. Dardzinski, et al
as 1:2017cv04440
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. Brooks
Defendant:
Kevin Dardzinski and Edward Buddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv03700
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN DARDZINSKI, EDWARD BUDDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. PF HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
PF HOLDINGS, LLC, JAWANA JOHNSON, LISA RAWLIGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS V. DARDZINSKI, ET AL
as 2:2014cv07474
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
KEVIN DARKZINSKI, EDWARD BUDDIN and THE BUREAU SQUAD OF THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Macon v. Charles Beddingfield
as 11-6031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH E. MACON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. BEDDINGFIELD, their official capacities as police officers for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson, D. B. BROOKS, their official capacities as police officers for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson and DAVID J. ROGERS, official capacity as dogcatcher for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson
Duffy v. Mange et al
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Duffy
Defendant:
M. Mange, Kent County Delaware, B. Brooke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-10616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
