Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant: Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff: Incorrectly Filed
Defendant: Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00305
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Kane County et al
as 1:2010cv00838
Defendant: Kane County, Patrick B. Perez, Catherine India and others
Plaintiff: Michael Morris, Michael Morris and Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01171
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Rodriguez v. Village of Montgomery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01826
Plaintiff: Diana Rodriguez, Diana Rodriguez and Diana Rodriguez
Defendant: Village of Montgomery, Dennis Schmidt and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1869
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lapotka v. Camacho et al
as 1:2007cv00093
Plaintiff: David Lapotka, David Lapotka and David Lapotka
Defendant: Ricardo Camacho, Ricardo Camacho, Ricardo Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?