Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Alyssa A. Williams et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Alyssa A. Williams, Jacob Williams and LeRoy M. Woods
Petitioner:
Patricia Borello and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana and Police Chief Robert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fariss-Borello v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2021cv01366
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fariss-Borello
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Real Party of Interest People of Moorish National Republic of Peace et al v. State of Florida Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sherriff's Office, Matthew Wayne Silverstein, E. Crawford, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Gadson, Jr. and Real Party of Interest People of Moorish National Republic of Peace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fariss-Borello v. Scottsdale, City of
as 2:2018cv04852
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fariss-Borello
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fariss-Borello v. Scottsdale, City of
as 2:2018cv02929
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fariss-Borello
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
