Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. National Medical Enterprises Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
National Medical Enterprises Inc., Temmler Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Rose Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepherd v. Ba-Yunus
as 6:2023cv06577
Plaintiff:
Elijah John Shepherd
Defendant:
Asad Ba-Yunus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
v. Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw et al
as 2:2023cv14124
Defendant:
Paws JJBCR, LLC d/ba The Noble Paw and Martin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al.
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION and Jaguar Sun and Coosa Nation, a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
