Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Bach v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv01687
Defendant:
Rich Williams, Kelly A. Martinez, City of Chula Vista and others
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Bach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hargrove v. Bach Team, LLC
as 4:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Courtney Hargrove
Defendant:
Bach Team, LLC and Bach Team, LLC doing business as Foursite Property Management doing business as Steeplechase Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Greenwood v. American Kennel Club et al
as 1:2023cv10516
Plaintiff:
Elaine Greenwood individually doing business as Logres Farm
Defendant:
American Kennel Club, Dennis Sprung, Dave Frei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv09981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adler Bach LLC v. Chelan County
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Adler Bach, LLC
Defendant:
Chelan County
Counter Defendant:
Adler Bach LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-3267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, ROBIN BACH and THOMAS A. KLEIN
BACH v. GLEASON
as 5:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE BACH
Defendant:
RICHARD GLEASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Gakuba v. Branden Maher, et al
as 22-2185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDEN A. MAHER, ROBIN BACH and THOMAS A. KLEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
