Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cole v. Diversified Maintenance et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cole
Defendant:
Diversified Maintenance, Home Depot, Best Buy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gomez et al v. Benison
as 7:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gomez and ILMWAK LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Benison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
A.S. et al v. Huntsville City Board of Education et al
as 5:2021cv01369
Plaintiff:
A.S. and G.S.
Defendant:
Huntsville City Board of Education, Christie Finley, Elisa Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabian v. City of Dothan et al
as 1:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Tom Davis and City of Dothan
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hinojosa Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murey v. The City of Chickasaw Alabama et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey
Defendant:
The City of Chickasaw Alabama , Michael E. Reynolds and C. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Southall et al v. Birmingham Jefferson Convention Center et al
as 2:2016cv01687
Plaintiff:
Mercutio Terrell Southall, Sr and Carlos Montez Chaverst, Jr
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson Convention Center and Donald F Trump for President Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
