Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Newdow, et al v. US Congress, et al
as 06-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL NEWDOW
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER LEFEVRE, Law Revision Counsel, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN W. SNOW, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae:
ATHEISTS AND OTHER FREETHINKERS, THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, United States Senator JIM DEMINT; United States Representatives ROBERT B. ANDERHOLT; W. TODD AKIN; ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, KEVIN BRADY; JOHN CAMPBELL; STEVE CHABOT; CHRIS FEENEY; VIRGINIA FOXX; TRENT FRANKS; SCOTT GARRETT; and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
