Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Rob Britten, Richard Martin, Ryan LaFave and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saylor v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Natalie Baker, Dennis Bakewell, Fred Britten and others
Plaintiff:
James Saylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. Douglas County, et al
as 8:2017cv00298
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Department of Corrections, Douglas County and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Uribe-Bazan v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2015cv00286
Defendant:
Mickie Baum, Correct Care Solutions, Jeannene Douglass and others
Plaintiff:
Myriam Janet Uribe-Bazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasgow v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2014cv00394
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Correct Care Solutions, County of Douglas, Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Velita Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasgow v. State of Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00244
Defendant:
Dr. Natalie Baker, City of Omaha, John Doe Defendants 1-100, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Velita Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kruger v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2014cv03139
Defendant:
Natalie Baker, Correct Care Solutions, Department of Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Ryan Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliveto v. Foxhall et al.
as 8:2014cv00069
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, John Doe, Mary Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Oliveto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
