Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz-Romero v. Candelario-Caliz et al
as 3:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Hon. Angel Candelario-Caliz, Hon. Ginny M. Velez-Carreras and Secretary of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz-Romero v. Candelario-Caliz, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
HON. ANGEL CANDELARIO-CALIZ, HON. GINNY M. VELEZ-CARRERAS and SECRETARY OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MITCHELL v. DE LA CARRERA et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL
Defendant:
DE LA CARRERA and RODNEY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
