Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
JIANG v. JOHSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
JOHSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GREATER JOHNSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT and COYLE PROPERTIES LIMITED II LLC HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coyle v. Harr et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jessica Coyle
Defendant:
Ross Harr, Kyle Cruz and City of Peoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paula Love v. Michael Coyle et al
as 5:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Paula Love
Defendant:
Michael Coyle, Richard McGee, Patricia Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JOHNSON v. VON ROSENTIEL et al
as 2:2023cv04179
Plaintiff:
TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON and TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTHA VON ROSENTIEL, MARTHA E VON ROSENTIEL, SHELLEY ROBIN-NEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Coyle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER P. COYLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, APS ASSOCIATES LLC, MIKE EDWARDS and others
COYLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
PETER P. COYLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE EDWARDS, UPPER SAUCON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. KING et al
as 3:2023cv03344
Defendant:
RAY KING, EVA L. KING, ANGELA WHITE DALTON and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
