Civil Rights Cases
Township of Middletown v. Curtis Smith, Jr.
as 23-3118
Plaintiff / Appellee: TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN
Defendant / Appellant: CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Middletown Township v. Curtis Smith, Jr.
as 23-3109
Plaintiff / Appellee: TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN
Defendant / Appellant: CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Appellant: CGSJ TRUST
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv03613
Plaintiff: MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP
Defendant: CURTIS G. SMITH and C.G.S.J. Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03619
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP
Defendant: CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
3Rd Party Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER A GOLD CONTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03625
Plaintiff: MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP
Defendant: CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
3Rd Party Defendant: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER A GOLD CONTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kauska v. Vondra et al
as 1:2011cv00496
Plaintiff: Terry Edward Kauska
Defendant: Charles Lynn Vondra and Curtis M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. City & County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2007cv02775
Plaintiff: Curtis L. Smith
Defendant: City & County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, Sui Ngor Tom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?