Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Doe v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2016cv05195
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, M.D. Lisa Walker, Steve Macdonald and others
Plaintiff:
Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Federation of Teachers, et al v. Texas Education Agency, et al
as 5:2020cv00222
Plaintiff:
Maxie Hollingsworth, Houston Federation of Teachers, Jackie Anderson and others
Defendant:
Texas Education Agency and Mike Morath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv06027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Santos et al
as 3:2017cv06945
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Danielle Santos, County of Sonoma and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. US DOL OSHA
as 1:2015cv09025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Santos
Defendant:
US DOL OSHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houston Federation of Teachers Local 2415 et al v. Houston Independent School District
as 4:2014cv01189
Plaintiff:
Houston Federation of Teachers Local 2415 , Daniel Santos , Paloma Garner and others
Defendant:
Houston Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MUHAMMAD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00859
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN M. FENTY, DANIELLE SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
