Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lopez v. City of New York
as 23-918
Plaintiff / Appellant: Carolyn Lopez, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Carlos Lopez, deceased
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York, John Doe, whose identities and numbers are presently unknown but who represent police officers and nonuniformed police employees of defendant City of New York, both in their individual and official capacities and Alfred Robinson, Detective
Joseph Brady v. Matt Grimm, et al
as 23-55359
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH BRADY
Defendant / Appellee: MATT GRIMM, Chief Operating Officer, Anuril Industries, ANURIL INDUSTRIES, a California Limited Liability Company, Irvine, California, LESLIE GARDNER, as Executive Director of the San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center Carlsbad, California, in her official capacity and in her personal capacity and others
CLEMONS v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00961
Defendant: THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, A.A. TEJADA, OFFICER N.B. FISHER and others
Plaintiff: PATRICK CLEMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35690
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, LINDA EIDE, individually and in her capacity as an employee of defendant Washington State Bar Association, ALLISON SATO, individually and in her capacity as defendant Washington State Bar Association and others
Cory Spencer, et al v. Lunada Bay Boys, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55364
Plaintiff - Appellant: CORY SPENCER, an individual, DIANA MILENA REED, an individual and COASTAL PROTECTION RANGERS, INC., a California non-profit public benefit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: LUNADA BAY BOYS, SANG LEE, an individual member of the Lunada Bay Boys, BRANT BLAKEMAN, an individual member of the Lunada Bay Boys and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-632
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ralph Eldridge v. City of Warren, MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1690
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: RALPH ELDRIDGE
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: CITY OF WARREN, MI, a municipal corporation, PATRICK K. MOORE, Police Officer and ROBERT HORLOCKER, individually and as agent employees of defendant City of Warren, jointly and severally
Ralph Eldridge v. City of Warren, MI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1637
Plaintiff - Appellant: RALPH ELDRIDGE
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF WARREN, MI, a municipal corporation, PATRICK K. MOORE, Police Officer and ROBERT HORLOCKER, individually and as agent employees of defendant City of Warren, jointly and severally
Raymond, et al v. Martinez, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2000
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL D. RAYMOND, individually and through his guardian and conservator, Kathryn J. Raymond, KATHRYN J. RAYMOND, individually and as wife of Michael D. Raymond, PATRICIA A. RAYMOND, daughter of Kathryn and Michael and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOE MARTINEZ, individually and as an agent and employee of Defendant City of Albuquerque
Defendant: CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, a Municipality and BRYAN NEAL, individually and as an agent and employee of Defendant City of Albuquerque
Lopez v. City of New York
as 11-5266
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carolyn Lopez, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Carlos Lopez, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, John Does, whose identities and numbers are presently unknown but who represent police officers and nonuniformed police employees of defendant City of New York, both in their individual and official capacities and Alfred Robinson, Detective

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?