Civil Rights Cases
Devin Singleton v. County of Riverside, et al
as 22-55956
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEVIN SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DION WILLIAMS, official capacity, RIVERSIDE COUNTY DPSS and others
Devin Singleton v. County of Riverside et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv02164
Plaintiff: Devin Singleton
Defendant: County of Riverside, Dion Williams and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2021cv00299
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER, SGT. CHRISTOPHER MCCORMICK and OFC. BRANDON MCCORMICK
Plaintiff: Mary Bair and Dion Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MI State A. Philip Randolph, et al v. Ruth Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2115
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHIGAN STATE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, MARY LANSDOWN, ERIN COMARTIN and others
Defendant - Appellant: RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State
MI State A. Philip Randolph, et al v. Ruth Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2071
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHIGAN STATE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, MARY LANSDOWN, ERIN COMARTIN and others
Defendant - Appellant: RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State
Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv11844
Plaintiff: Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute , Mary Lansdown , Erin Comartin and others
Defendant: Ruth A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Kurtz v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00191
Plaintiff: Joseph A. Kurtz
Defendant: Dion Williams and Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03710
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?