Civil Rights Cases
Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of, et al v. Anthonee Patterson, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH INC and CHURCH OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH
Defendant: ANTHONEE PATTERSON and ROCHELLE BILAL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Defendant / Appellee: LE WEAVER & ASSOCIATES PC, MICHAEL K. TWERSKY, ESQ., individually and in his role as attorney for The Trustees of the General Assembly, JOHN CARLTON THOMAS, individually and in his role as Trustee of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith and others
Voegeli, Pharon v. City of Janesville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00845
Defendant: Jaysen Cleasby, James Schuler, Daniel Banks and others
Plaintiff: Pharon J. Voegeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2017cv03176
Plaintiff: Marqus Martinez , Daniel Banks , Jesus Lopez and others
Defendant: County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas and Mazen Awad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Berge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02129
Plaintiff: Claudius Banks, Danielle Banks and Daynelle Banks
Defendant: Officer Christian Berge and City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marqus Martinez et al v. County of Sonoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04574
Plaintiff: Marqus Martinez and Daniel Banks
Defendant: County of Sonoma , Steve Freitas , Mazen Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?