Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dudley v. Hochul et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Governor Kathy Hochul, New York State, Dr. James V. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. DeJoseph
as 17-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fred Burgess, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Christopher DeJoseph, individually and in his official capacity, Robert Teater, individually and in his official capacity, Fred Lamberton, individually and in his official capacity and others
Harris v. Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy
as 16-2759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David G Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP, Tony R. Sears, Thomas S. D'Antonio and others
Defendant:
Henry Scudder, Edward Carni, Rose Sconiers and others
Harris v. Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP et al
as 6:2015cv06615
Plaintiff:
David G. Harris
Defendant:
Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP, Tony Sears, Thomas S. D'Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. DeJoseph et al
as 5:2014cv01371
Plaintiff:
Fred Burgess, II
Defendant:
Christopher DeJoseph, Robert Teater, Fred Lamberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Davis, et al
as 11-4632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC ANTWAIN X. RIVERS MUHAMMAD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
YVETTE DAVIS, LUZERNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, LUZERNE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION and others
Muhammad v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv01292
Plaintiff:
Marc Antwain X. Rivers Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Davis, The Luzerne County Department of Public Welfare, The Luzerne County Court Common Pleas Domestic Relations Section and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
