Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Martinez v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Joanie E. Martinez
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postmaster Leon Lane, Jr. and Supervisor Baxter 'Bud' Lofland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Michael Jon Bowman v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Bowman
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, E. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimshaw v. Graham et al
as 2:2022cv14064
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Grimshaw
Defendant:
Donald L. Graham, Jose E. Martinez, Ursula Ungaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martinez v. Black
as 3:2020cv08623
Plaintiff:
Marcella E Martinez
Defendant:
Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez v. Napa State Hospital, et al
as 3:2020cv08631
Defendant:
Cindy Black, Marcella E Martinez, California Department of State Hospitals and others
Plaintiff:
Marcella Elizabeth Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DiStefano v. Diaz et al
as 8:2019cv02331
Defendant:
Allison M. Perry, Manual Diaz, III, Tammy L. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony V. DiStefano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
